IE11 Not Supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Some Have Qualms about New State Tax Filing System

One of the world’s largest accounting firms chose the tried-and-true traditional option when the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration asked firms to start using a new online system for filing business sales tax returns. KPMG decided that for now, it was better off submitting tax returns on paper through the mail.

One of the world’s largest accounting firms chose the tried-and-true traditional option when filing its business taxes with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration.

KPMG, the worldwide accounting and auditing firm, tried the new program, which the state advocated, and decided it was better off submitting tax returns on paper through the mail.

It was an early warning that businesses would struggle with the new Centralized Revenue Opportunity System (CROS), a $290 million program that the state has been developing since 2010.

CROS went live in May, but most businesses had their first interaction with the new program last month, when they had to report quarterly sales tax revenue to meet a state deadline.

Many had trouble figuring out the program, contributing to a record-breaking crunch of complaints and calls to the department’s customer service center.

This week, department Director Nicolas Maduros told lawmakers that the program generally works as intended, but that it’s not easy to use as the program it replaced.

“The system works, but certainly we are not entirely happy with where we are at the moment,” he said at a Joint Legislative Audit Committee hearing.

A KPMG associate in May wrote to the tax department and reported that the new system was too time-consuming for its employees.

Previously, the state’s online business tax filing program automatically inserted information for local sales tax rates.

CROS requires the filer to insert that information, making the task more difficult if a business had sales in multiple cities and counties.

“With this change, we would need to manually select all of these locals every time, adding many hours or work to our process ... (every) quarter,” the associate wrote in a message obtained by The Sacramento Bee through the California Public Records Act.

KPMG’s qualms would be echoed two months later by independent businesses and smaller accounting firms, which similarly said the new program was more difficult to use than its predecessor. Two accountants told The Bee it took them 90 minutes to file a return in CROS, about an hour longer than they used to spend filing an electronic return.

The Legislature created the tax department a year ago when it stripped the Board of Equalization of most of its power and staff. The Board of Equalization began developing CROS eight years ago and hired a contractor to build it in 2016. Over the years, the Board of Equalization touted the efficiencies it gained by persuading tax filers to submit their returns electronically.

In 2011, then-Board Chairman Jerome Horton published a press release that said the agency saved $3 million by persuading taxpayers to use the online system. In 2016, the agency reported that 99 percent of its taxpayers had submitted electronic returns.

Maduros told lawmakers that department staff and contractors are working around the clock to improve the new system. The department tracks complaints and questions during the day and tries to resolve problems overnight, he said.

“It’s natural when you transition a million taxpayers to a new system that they will have issues,” he said.